Unlearn. | rejoyce letters, vol. 9

Hi Friend, 

While reading The White Album, the Joan Didion essay collection not to be confused with the beloved Beatles' record, I was suddenly compelled to underline a sentence in pen. It was page 134, and I, up to that point, hadn't established this as an underlining type of book, but sometimes a sentence resonates with me so strongly I have to drop everything and underscore it in ink.

Here's the line:

"I have trouble maintaining the basic notion that keeping promises matters in a world where everything I was taught seems beside the point."

Some friends found this quote depressing; I can see that. But to me, that sentence feels full of unspoken promise.

If everything you were taught is beside the point, then maybe all the things you struggle with, all the things "wrong" with you, the things that keep you up at night, that torture you, all those things, are not actually you. They are things you were taught. And, therefore, you can unlearn them as you once learned them.

It's not you, it's the system—and you can break free from the system. 

I began noticing a theme of unlearning in spirituality books, but that's not the only place this theme emerges. Before Yoda says his famous, "Do or do not, there is no try" line in The Empire Strikes Back, he first says to a discouraged Luke Skywalker: 

"You must unlearn what you have learned."

There's a profound truth in those seven words. 

It's often tempting to think personal growth is all about learning new things. Read more books! Attend more conferences! Watch more TED talks! Listen to more podcasts!

But I'm starting to believe unlearning is equally, if not more, important. A lot of transformation is about returning to who you already are, at your core. Removing blockages and disposing of unhelpful stories you (consciously or subconsciously) believe can be more important than adding "new" knowledge. 

Imagine you are trying to grow a basil plant in a small pot. You plant it as a seed, and it sprouts! But right along side it are a few weeds. You ignore them, and keep watering your beloved basil plant devotedly. It grows a little grows more, but doesn't seem to be doing so hot—because as you water it, you're watering the weeds, so the weeds grow, too. You decide you love your basil plant, and you'll do anything for it (all while ignoring the weeds), so you go see a plant specialist. You start moving it around constantly so it is in optimal sunlight every hour of every day. You read books on basil. You start playing music for your plant, since you heard that helps. Still, it's not really thriving, and there are those growing, pesky weeds you're not ready to think about...so you buy special plant food, you add healing crystals to the soil, etc., etc.

What you really need to do—obviously—is not add anything to that little pot. You need to take something away.

You have to pull the goddamn weeds.

You must unlearn what you have learned.

It's absurd, but I've found it's often difficult for me to pull the metaphorical "weeds" in my life—to kill off stories that don't serve me, even after I've become fully conscious of them (which is the first step). 

You see, I've grown attached to my weeds. I mean, I've hung out with them for years. It feels like they're a part of me. Who am I without them?

It goes something like this: Hmmm...maybe I'll read more instead of addressing the realization that I've had this damaging thought pattern for over a decade...I mean, sure, it sucks that after I hang out with people my mind lists all the reasons those people don't actually like me, but that's just me. Whatever. Rather than consider stopping that, let me re-read some Rilke...

We often erroneously conflate familiar things with comfortable things; even if those things are literally hurting us and preventing our growth—still, we cling to the familiar.

In The Power of Now, Eckhart Tolle says:

"Once you have identified with some form of negativity, you do not want to let it go, and on a deeply unconscious level, you do not want positive change. It would threaten your identity as a depressed, angry, or hard-done by person. You will then ignore, deny, or sabotage the positive change in your life.

This is a common phenomenon. It is also insane."

In addition to the negativity you've personally identified with (your "little" weeds) there are larger, society-based "weeds" worth unlearning, as well. 

These can be even more challenging (no honest person said personal growth was a day at the beach) because the first step of removing anything is becoming consciously aware of it. Some of these larger societal "weeds" have been engrained since birth. You might believe them so strongly you don't even realize they're learned beliefs; you might mistakenly assume they are, simply, true.

I'm talking things like:

Life is fun when you're a kid, but sucks when you're an adult.

More is better.

Net worth is correlated with self worth.

Success is quantifiable.

Some people are better than other people.

I don't believe any of those statements—not at my core. Though, sometimes, I know my actions or words say otherwise. My life reinforces the very ideas my soul rejects. But, I'm trying to be patient with myself—because just like learning, unlearning is a process, too. As Rumi says: 

"I need more grace than I thought."

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s. The White Album essay collection is the only Didion I've read. I enjoyed it and she's a very talented writer, but I occasionally struggled when she made in-depth references to books or people I hadn't heard of. 

p.p.s. The Power of Now is one of my favorite books. I, personally, recommend reading Singer's The Untethered Soul first to establish a foundation and then The Power of Now—but if you're only going to read one, I say, go with Tolle. He blew my mind.

p.p.p.s. Context for the Rumi quote here. (And a bonus Rumi poem!)

Marriage. | rejoyce letters, vol. 8

Hi Friend,

First, I want to acknowledge that, though I am married, there's still a chance I know next to nothing about marriage. As Rumi says:

"The art of knowing is knowing what to ignore."

So if this (or any) letter doesn't resonate with you, please ignore it. 

Also, it's likely that expounding upon Love or marriage is futile, since both topics, in their purest forms, are too immense for words, too immeasurable to reduce to the inherent restrictions of any language. 

Still, I decided to try since tomorrow is our two year wedding anniversary. (Stephen and I got married on May 29, 2016 in Madison, Wisconsin; it was a beautiful day and cheese curds were served during cocktail hour.)

I'm going to focus on something I believe marriage is not about and see where that leads: I do not believe marriage is about reciprocity. I don't think it's about "balancing the scales" or "carrying your weight" or "equal contribution." 

Some examples from my own marriage:

Stephen spent about eight hours this year jointly filing our taxes (it was a mess, multiple states, etc.). During that time, I mostly read poetry and pet the cats.

Then again: I do laundry way more than he does.

Then again, when Stephen grocery shops he gets enough food for all meals for the week, and when I do (which, firstly, is a rare phenomenon) I buy enough snacks to feed a youth soccer league yet hardly any items translatable into breakfast, lunch, or dinner. (Snacking is my strong suit.)

I could keep going...back and forth...he does this, but I do this! I do this, but he does this! But, why??? It's exhausting. Also, I'm bored.

First Corinthians chapter 13 famously says, "Love keeps no record of wrongs." I agree. But I also think Love keeps no record of rights. Love keeps no record, period. 


Is marriage a competition? Am I a better wife than he is a husband or vice versa? Of course not. 

What are you possibly gaining by keeping score in your own relationship? If you want to leave your relationship, then leave it. If you want to stay, then make like the Beatles and let it be. :) 

When Lao Tzu speaks of wise souls (not that I claim to have one), Tzu says:

"Not competing,

they have in all the world no competitor."

We printed this Hafiz poem on our wedding programs:

Even

After

All this time

The Sun never says to the Earth,

"You owe me."

Look

What happens

With a love like that,

It lights the

Whole

Sky.

In my opinion, marriage isn't about owing anyone anything. Full stop.

[Note: I don't claim to have mastered this keeps-no-records approach by any means and still find myself making the occasional petty comment, but I am practicing noting when I get off course, forgiving myself, and re-centering on what matters. Who vacuums more than whom, truly, does not matter. Rumi refrain: The art of knowing is knowing what to ignore.]

Since learning to love wholly is often an ongoing practice, I definitely think that, if you marry, whom you marry is extremely important.

Rumi says: 

"Set your soul on fire, seek those who fan your flames."

To me, no quote better describes Stephen. His "fandom" for me started in the traditional sense, when he'd often comprise one-quarter of the four-person student section at Bucknell Women's Basketball games. Now, some claim women's basketball is not much of a spectator sport to begin with (haha), and that season (my junior year) we won seven games and lost 21. Yet, he was there, waiting long after the buzzer for me to emerge, wet-haired and upset, from the locker room. 

His support continued: when I started a (now retired) blog my senior year, he'd carefully proofread my posts (often on topics that didn't remotely interest him). Recently, he has read entire manuscripts I've written. One was over 250 pages! He read it with an intensity and carefulness that I can only call Love. I'm not pursuing publication for said manuscript, but just thinking about him reading it brings tears to my eyes. 

As I've shifted into this meditation and healing stage, he gave me the book Tao Te Ching: A Book About the Way and the Power of the Way by Lao Tzu. (The Tzu quote from last week and this week are from that book.)

I now realize that this thread runs through our eight-year relationship: He has always fanned my flames. 

I think that's an underrated quality in a partner. I say, don't look for someone you need (you don't need anyone) and don't look for someone who makes you feel whole (you are whole and if you don't feel whole, the only person who will ever make you feel whole is you). 

Look, instead, for someone who supports you, as you are. Right now. Today. Whether you're missing foul shots or misspelling words. (:

Now, my husband dislikes public attention (I'm sorry, Stephen, I promise I won't mention you for the next ten letters), but I wanted to end with a short note for him:

Dear Stephen, Words could never contain my feelings for you, so I will simply put this on record: I would marry you again. And again and again and again. xoxo. c

with Love and with Light, 

Joyce

p.s. Stephen's favorite number has always been 8, so it feels magical to me that this is volume 8. (: 

p.p.s. I recommend the Tao Te Ching if you're drawn to spirituality. However, though the poems are seemingly simple, I'm sure most of their deeper meanings are eluding me in my current state. I recently listened to Michael A. Singers' The Untethered Soul and not only would I recommend that book in itself as a good starting point for spiritual/consciousness work (the first two chapters are a bit redundant, but stick with it!), Singer also has a chapter dedicated to the Tao (aka Dao) which enhanced my understanding of Lao Tzu's writings. 

Innate. | rejoyce letters, vol. 7

 

Hi Friend,

When people would ask poet William Stafford, "When did you become a poet?" he'd reply, "That's not really the right question. The question is: when did you stop being a poet? We're all poets when we're little, and some of just keep up the habit."

The reason I've been mulling over this Stafford quote is not because I'm considering poem writing, but because I've been contemplating these questions: What are we born with? What do we lose along the way? And, what can we return to?

There's a child theme running through many spiritual teachings, and it is, frankly, one I have difficulty understanding.

Jesus said:

"Truly, I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven." [Matthew 18:3, NIV]

And ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said:

"Can you keep your soul in its body,

hold fast to the one,

and so learn to be whole?

Can you center your energy, 

be soft, tender,

and so learn to be a baby?"

I like those quotes, but their meanings seem beyond my reach.

When I think of my childhood, my mind sometimes lands on second through fourth grade, when I was teased pretty relentlessly, especially on the school bus. The "reasons" for the teasing seemed to be:

a.) I was abnormally tall.

b.) I was a "new kid" (we'd moved across the country at the end of first grade)

c.) I cried incredibly easily. 

Not the best combo for scaling the elementary school social ladder.

I took to reading at the bus stop, reading as I walked to my seat, and reading during bus rides, cheek against the window.

Still, the teasing persisted. I have a distinct memory of standing up at my stop to go home and finding that, when my face had been in a book, someone had crawled beneath my seat and tied the shoelaces of my shoes together. I found this out because I nearly fell over when I tried to walk. I put on my backpack and hobbled down the aisle, flooded with confusing, pervasive shame. Everyone, it seemed, was laughing at me. I think I was about eight.

I drew the conclusion there must be something innately wrong with me. Something definitively not right at the core of who I was. Surely, if I were "right" and "normal" then I wouldn't be the go-to girl to tease on the bus.

During that time, I remember nice classmates with exceptional clarity. One boy in my second and fourth grade class was consistently kind to me—a dim light in my periphery reminding me not all boys were cruel. 

After college, this boy married one of my best friends from high school and, this past Friday, I got to hold their newborn baby girl in my arms. She was sixteen days old, the youngest baby I've ever held. (With the exception of my two little sisters when I was a child.) Long after I gave her back to her mom and drove away, I could still feel her pure energy on my chest, where she had curled up against me.

Some observations: Babies are magic. Babies are miracles. Babies are perfect. 

Also: Babies are not innately wrong, flawed, or evil. I know this won't win me points with the Pope, but I reject the notion of "Original Sin." I just don't buy it. Hold an infant and tell me: where is the inclination toward evil?

And if nothing is wrong with babies, and I was once a baby, then maybe that idea I formed in elementary school—something is wrong with me—is, actually, what's wrong. 

Now it wasn't just bullies, society certainly encouraged me cling to the concept of my inherent wrongness. How could the global $445 billion so-called "beauty" industry keep growing if people weren't convinced there's something wrong with their skin, faces, or hair?  

Capitalism essentially drives on perpetually reinforcing this core idea: there is something wrong with you, and money can fix it. 

There are countless iterations: Something is wrong with your house/wardrobe/body/relationship/etc., and money can help fix it. [See: the fast fashion industry, the $60 billion U.S. weight loss industry, reality TV elevating opulent lifestyles, etc., etc., etc.] [Also see: almost any ad ever.]

Everything is wrong; money is always the answer. 

But what if there is actually no problem?

What if you risked acting on the assumption that nothing is innately wrong with you? 

What if to change to become a little child, you simply had to accept the idea that you are enough? Right now. Today. Just as you are.

Because here's the thing: I know that sweet baby girl I held against me did not think anything was wrong with her; she knew she was perfect.

You were once sixteen days old. Had I held you in my arms when you were an infant, I would've told you: You are magic. You are a miracle. You are perfect. Of course, I wouldn't have had to tell you those things, because you would've already known.

Isn't there a chance it's still true?  Isn't there a chance our innate selves are not depraved, but, instead, miraculous and full of Love?

Isn't there a chance we don't need to buy anything to save us, rather, we simply need to return to who we already are?

Rumi says:

"Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it."

Maybe, you're born with it. Maybe, Love is innate.

with Love and with Light, 

Joyce

p.s. This week's (predictable) book rec: Rumi The Book of Love: Poems of Ecstasy and Longing translated by Coleman Barks.

p.p.s. There is nothing wrong with your skin, face, or hair. Nothing. I appreciate this Nayyirah Waheed quote on the topic. (I also like her onInstagram.)

Journey. | rejoyce letters, vol. 6

Hi Friend, 

One thing I've noticed in taking "time off" is people will ask me: Are you going to travel?

It's a sensible question. I have all this "time I might never have again" (personally, I consider that a limiting belief) especially, they say, because I'm childless, so it's currently socially acceptable to backpack New Zealand and "find myself" or whatever. Contemporary society accepts this narrative, a variation of the modern day hero's journey. (Though it seems even more socially accepted if you make a viral Instagram travel account along the way.)

I suppose I can now answer this travel question with, "Yes!" since I'm sending this letter from New Orleans, where I road tripped with my mom and twin sister. We planned this trip spontaneously and ended up seeing an amazing live jazz performance at Preservation Hall yesterday on Mother's Day—talk about last week's theme of perfect timing. :)

I like big trips (and I cannot lie). I've been on three big international trips—Spain, Portugal, and Chile—since 2015 and love talking travel.

But here's the thing: any good writer (or anyone who's taken tons of writing classes, like yours truly) will tell you that the outer journey in the plot line of a story is only as strong as the inner journey.

That's why there are books and movies where tons of action happens (car chases! sex! murders!), but nothing really happens, and it's not satisfying. No characters grow.

The reverse can be true, too: a book where nothing "happens" but it's satisfying because the character goes through an inner transformation.  I am partial to exactly this type of book. One of my favorite books where "nothing happens" is the novel Housekeeping by Marilynne Robinson. It's set in Idaho and quiet and haunting and has some perfectly-strung sentences that blew my mind. Another "quiet" book I absolutely love is Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout (which won the Pulitzer). (Note: Robinson's Gilead won the Pulitzer, but I preferred Housekeeping. I didn't link to it because the description is spoiler-y. If you want a rather solemn book immersed in the natural world about an insular, eccentric family, read it. If you want a page turner, read something else.)

Fiction aside, I believe in the power of both the journey without and the journey within, and am recently reveling in the power of the latter. If you aren't willing to open your mind and heart, then wherever you go, there you are. If you don't change how you see things, then whether you're in Paris, France or Istanbul, Turkey or Dayton, Ohio, you don't grow. 

I think this is what my homeboy Rilke was referring to when he said: 

"The only journey is the one within." 

I recently attended a virtual meditation retreat and it was wild because, even though I didn't leave my apartment, it felt like I traveled miles and miles within. 

During one session, we did the Ananda Mandala meditation. (You can find it on YouTube, though I recommend doing it with a guide in a group for your first time. In NYC I easily found groups that do this.) This meditation is designed to clear Chakras and raise Kundalini energy through a special, vigorous breathing technique.

(Chakras are the seven energy centers in the body down the spine's path (bottom to top: root, sacral, solar plexus, heart, throat, third eye, crown). In Sanskrit, the word Chakra means "wheel" because these centers, essentially, spin with energy. Kundalini energy is primal or life force energy, known as Chi (Chinese) or Prana (Sanskrit).)

After we finished the Ananda Mandala meditation, I felt like I had run ten miles, which is something, for the record, I've never actually done. And the wildest thing: I'd been "merely" sitting and breathing the whole time. 

Kabir, an Indian poet, said: 

"I felt in need of a great pilgrimage, so I sat still for three days."

And Rumi, my go-to Sufi poet, said:

"Everything in the universe is within you."

So whether you're reading this from your sofa or a hemisphere away from your home, may this serve as a kind reminder that anything you could ever need is already inside. 

with Love and with Light and with all of the beignets,

Joyce

p.s. The first sentence in this letter irks me because I believe there's no such thing as "time off." I'm currently doing everything I've done my whole life with one exception: I'm not exchanging my energy for currency. If we consider people "on" when they're exchanging energy for dollars and otherwise "off" then I think that's indicative of a larger problem in our society: the problem of thinking personal worthiness = net worth. That is a notion I reject entirely. 

p.p.s. I recently polled well-traveled friends on their favorite places in the world (and would love to hear yours!). I enjoyed these answers so wanted to share: Mexico City, the Swiss Alps, Tel Aviv, Key West, Hong Kong, and Prague. I've been to zero of those places, and would love to go to them all. As for today though, I'll continue exploring the Big Easy and, through meditation, explore more of the universe within, as well. :)

Patience. | rejoyce letters, vol. 5

 

Hi Friend, 

If you were raised Christian or have ever attended a wedding, you're likely familiar with this Bible passage on Love: First Corinthians, Chapter 13, starting at verse 4:

"Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud..."

I went to Presbyterian church every Sunday of my childhood and tons of youth groups and church camps to boot. So, at least 9,320 times a teacher said: "Now, replace the word 'love' from this passage with your name."

My problem is the pesky order of these attributes. I've never been too boastful and always rather kind, but that's not where we start. Of course not. Apostle Paul dives right in with one of the arch nemeses of my life: Patience.

So, each of the countless times I did this exercise, I wrote: "Joyce is patient" knew it was a gigantic lie, and kinda threw in the towel from there. (Even at age eight, I just couldn't lie to myself about this.)

Now seems a good time to shout out anyone who has ever:

a.) worked on any type of deadline-based project with me

b.) waited for a table at a restaurant with me

c.) waited for food at a restaurant with me while other people who sat down after us already got their food (!)

You, my friend, are the real MVP. (:

I only recently realized these "minor" yet consistent spurts of impatience could speak to a larger theme in my life. 

There's small-scale patience, like waiting two hours to get pizza in Brooklyn. [I admit: this can be worth it. :)]

And then large-scale patience, which I define as: accepting that everything in your life is happening in perfect timing.

For me, small-scale patient can be tough, and large-scale patience can border impossible. I'm almost 30 (!) so found myself being hypercritical of my life's timing—especially my "career path." 

At times, I'm like: Who cares? Trying to contain a luminous human being to a résumé, a single sheet of paper in bullet point format, is ludicrous.

But, at other times, self-sabotaging thoughts reign: I missed the boat. If I were going to "accomplish" anything in life, I would have already. I've always wanted to be a writer, but have nothing "to show for it." There are people my age who are physicians!!

When I'm wading in this cesspool of thought, I ignore things like the blatant fact I've never had any desire to be a physician. I am immersed in two states: self-pity and impatience.

On self-pity: I think Cheryl Strayed says it best in this advice column:

"Self-pity is a dead end road."

On impatience: Austrian poet Rainer Maria Rilke can help. In Letters to a Young Poet [one of my favorite books!] he writes: 

"Let your judgments follow their quiet, undisturbed evolution, which, like all progress, must come from deep within and cannot be pressured or hurried in any way. It's all about carrying to term and giving birth. To let every impression and every seed of a feeling realize itself on its own, in the dark, in the unconveyable, the unconscious, beyond the reach of your understanding, and to await with deep humility and patience the hour when a new clarity is born; this alone is to live artistically, in understanding as in creation.

Time is no measure there, a year is worthless, and ten years are nothing. To be an artist means not to calculate and not to count; to mature like a tree that does not pressure its sap and stands amid the spring storms with assurance and without the slightest fear that summer might not come. It does come. But it comes only for the patient ones, who stand about as if eternity lay before them, so unconcernedly still and vast. I learn this every day, learn it amidst considerable pain, for which I am grateful. Patience is everything!"

Inspired by this passage and a Belief Work class I'm taking, I started this: Each time I noticed a beautiful, blossoming tree, a tree that never feared if summer would come, I used it as a trigger to think this affirmation: "Perfect timing is at work for me."

At first, I didn't believe it at all. I actually couldn't even remember the seven words and had to keep looking them up and then felt dumb. But, guys, the craziest thing (!) is happening: I'm starting to truly believe it. 

I even believe I'll soon be able to say, "Joyce is patient" and know it to be true.

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s. If you ever feel like you've missed the boat, a kind reminder: There is no boat. :)

p.p.s. If you have any q's about my experience in Belief class, feel free to reply directly to this email. A few of you have kindly replied in the past and prefaced your emails with "Sorry to bother you..." and I want to put on record I'll never be bothered by a genuine reply.

p.p.p.s. I am sometimes impatient and I am also often fun to eat with and competent to work with. It feels weird typing this since our society often accepts self-loathing but questions self-acceptance, but I wanted to put this note here, for me. As Rumi says: "Good and bad are mixed. If you don't have both, you don't belong with us."

Accepting. | rejoyce letters, vol. 4

 

Hi Friend, 

In Stephen Chbosky's The Perks of Being a Wallflower, high school freshman Charlie is agonized because a girl he cares for is dating a boy who hits her. He confides this in his English teacher who responds with a quote I consider the backbone of the novel:

"We accept the love we think we deserve."

Accepting is tricky business. We've all heard the serenity prayer:

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, 

Courage to change the things I can, 

And wisdom to know the difference.

But I think we can too quickly put things in the former category. We accept too soon. We say with resignation, "It is what it is," about an entirely changeable situation. (Maybe not easily changeable, but still entirely changeable.)

Sure, there are some definitively unchangeable things worth accepting. Example: I am six feet, two inches tall. For large swaths of my adolescence, I viewed my height as a struggle. Essentially, I rejected it.

[Aside: I believe I rejected it because society so clearly did. It wasn't particularly helpful that, starting in Kindergarten, adults constantly said to me: "Don't worry, the boys will catch up." 

It strikes me now that in this oft-repeated comment my height was not only being interpreted as an inherent problem (I don't think I would've worried about it had I not been informed, so insistently, to not worry about it) but also, this "problem" was immediately related to males. The "problem" wasn't how tall I was; it was how tall the boys weren't. From literally age five, my physicality wasn't about me; it was about males who were my age. (I could go very Simone de Beauvoir here and write a subject/object elaboration but will save that for another day. :)]

Accepting my height and not resisting it was an important, peaceful step for me. (I don't merely "accept" it now. At around 19, I started loving being tall and never looked back.)

I believe a certain level of self-acceptance is empowering; however, we often accept things into our lives that do not serve us. And accepting things here and there even though they don't feel right can be insidious. Suddenly, you look around and hate everything about your job. Or your relationship. Or your life. 

And it hurts because you likely know, at some level, you chose it, or, at least you accepted it. It's an incredibly painful realization: that the moth-eaten holes within yourself are not entirely from external sources. That there are holes that cannot be blamed on bad parents or bad partners or bad circumstances. There are holes eaten from moths that you accepted into your life. 

This is the worst, but it's also the best. :) Because on the other side of this realization is freedom. You do not have to continue accepting things into your life that do not serve you.

Brian Andreas sums it up well in this "life secret" in his lovely book Something Like Magic:

"Secret #7: You don't have to put up with anything. You can do something different."

To return to Chbosky, the question is less about what we accept and more about what we think we deserve. I'd even rewrite his quote as:

"We accept the life we think we deserve."

So: What do we think we deserve? What do we truly deserve? Is there a gap?

Often, there is a gap stemming from beliefs formed early in life. Rather than delve into limiting beliefs today, I decided to cut to the chase for you. (:

Things you deserve:

You deserve to be seen.

You deserve to be heard.

You deserve to be loved.

You deserve to be connected to your power.

As Rumi says:

"You were born with wings.

You were not meant for crawling, so don't.

You have wings.

Learn to use them, and fly."

You do not deserve a life of crawling, so no need to accept one.

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s. I recommend Perks. The teacher lends books to Charlie, most of which I've read and loved. Also, "Landslide" by Fleetwood Mac has a moment as does "Something" by the Beatles, two of my favorite songs. (Basically: I can't tell if this is an amazing book or just happens to be set in my hometown (Pittsburgh) featuring books and songs I love, but I almost never re-read books and I just re-read this one and still love it.)

p.p.s. Brian Andreas is awesome on Instagram.

p.p.p.s. In my second letter I spoke of the importance of finding joy, peace, love, and fulfillment in the present. I still believe this. Here's the thing: you never accept things in the past or future; you only accept in the present. So I'm advocating for present-tense changes in this (and every) letter.

Understanding. | rejoyce letters, vol. 3

Hi Friend, 

When I was in seventh grade I had an all-consuming crush on a boy with artfully-spiked brown hair who I'll call Mike. Mike and I had exchanged maybe fifteen words, but I had proof he knew my name. And if you think a boy knowing your name is not a foundation on which you can construct an elaborate fantasy reality in your mind, then you've likely never been a seventh-grade girl with a crush.

When I was not in Mike's presence, I was hardly alive. Other than the infinite things wrong with the previous statement, what was wrong to seventh-grade me was that we had but one of eight classes together (Home Economics). I spent the rest of the school day in nearly insufferable exile. 

So: my friend and I devised a plan. (I believe my friend also had a crush on Mike? Or fully supported mine? Maybe both. Middle school crushes were often, strangely, shared.)

We memorized Mike's schedule and, in the eight minutes between periods, we'd walk wildly out of our way to cross paths with Mike and THEN (this is where it goes from embarrassing to mortifying) we attempted to brush shoulders with him in the hallway. Like, physically. 

I don't fully get hormones, you guys, but we did this for weeks. Maybe months. 

What strikes me now is how little I understood Mike. 

I mean, I knew facts about him. But I am just now beginning to appreciate the vastness between knowing and understanding.

Things I knew about Mike: his schedule, his siblings' names, where he lived, his entire wardrobe (lots of Steelers gear), every word he spoke in Home Ec. Things I understood about Mike: nothing.

Then why my obsession?

In Thich Nhat Hanh's book How to Love he writes: 

"Often, we get crushes on others not because we truly love and understand them, but to distract ourselves from our suffering. When we learn to love and understand ourselves and have true compassion for ourselves, then we can truly love and understand another person."

After reading that, I was back rushing through a crowded locker-lined hallway, trying desperately to brush shoulders with a stranger and calling it "love."

Thankfully, after seventh grade, I became enlightened and approached all of my relationships, romantic and otherwise, from a place of compassionate understanding.

Hahahaha.

Yeah, right. The next decade of crushes was basically variations on this theme: throwing myself into the paths of boys I hardly understood, brushing various body parts in desperate attempts at finding a connection that could bring me out of exile and make me feel alive.

This entire approach is clearly very flawed, but today I'm focusing on one aspect: my lack of understanding (for these boys and for myself). 

Rampant misunderstanding extends beyond romance, of course. Politically, it feels like half of our country does not understand the other half at all. (True for both halves.) It's so easy to "know" things about someone and judge them; it's so difficult to truly understand them. 

Another example: Have you ever been eating dinner with your parents and they start telling a guest a story you've never heard before? And you're like: Who are you? 

In Thich Nhat Hanh's Being Peace [Recommend! All forthcoming Hanh quotes are from this book.] he writes: "We are not capable of understanding each other, and that is the main source of human suffering."

The Buddha said in order to understand, you have to be one with what you want to understand.

But how?

It might not be about knowledge. Hanh: "Guarding knowledge is not a good way to understand. Understanding means to throw away your knowledge...The Buddhist way of understanding is always letting go of our views and knowledge in order to transcend."

[This made me think of "the Fall" in Genesis, stemming from Adam and Eve eating fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.]

I unearth misunderstandings in my life all the time, but I like to think I'm moving in the direction toward understanding. I've begun asking "off-script" questions to people I "know" and then (the hard part for me): truly listening to their answers. This has been eye (and heart) opening for me.

Maybe Rumi summarizes it best: 

"The soul has been given its own ears to hear things that the mind does not understand."

It's difficult to shed things we "know"—we're conditioned to cling to them. But could it be worth it? After all, Hanh says: "Understanding is the source of love." 

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s.  In my interpretation, the philosophical Chinese room thought experiment also addresses knowledge vs. understanding from a different angle (focusing on artificial intelligence).

p.p.s. Congrats to each one of you for having survived seventh grade. (:

Arrival. | rejoyce letters, vol. 2

Hi Friend, 

When my husband and I first started dating, we texted with T9 word, John Mayer had just dropped Battle Studies, and watching YouTube videos was still a novelty.

So I vividly remember the first time he showed me a YouTube video. It was called "Life and Music" by philosopher Alan Watts. (You can easily Google it if interested; I don't link videos since they show as attachments.)

The premise of the video is this: LIFE IS A HUGE SCAM. :) 

Okay, that's not entirely it. The video hones in on the ever-elusive "point of arrival." The trap of thinking that, as Watts says, "The thing is coming! It's coming!" It's coming after high school, then after college, then....etc. It's always coming, but never here. 

Essentially, society tricks us into thinking we will only experience joy, peace, and fulfillment in the future. (I'm not even getting into religions, some of which preach: Don't worry, life sucks, but you can have peace after you die.)

Even the U.S. declaration seems ominous: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Is pursuing what we truly desire?

Despite seeing this video at age 21, I do think I lived most of my twenties falling into this trap. Until recently, when I started monitoring my thought patterns (through meditation), this seemed to be my brain's default programming.

On the macro level: When I'm done with basketball, I'll be happy; When I get a raise, I'll be happy; When I quit this job, I'll be happy; When I move, I'll be happy.

And the micro level: I can't wait for spring; I can't wait for vacation; I can't wait for Friday.

I was constantly living with one foot out the door.

In Sara Bareilles's song Vegas she sings:

"It's always just around the corner, oh, you're on your way to somewhere. That is bigger, better, if you could only get there."

But you never get "there" do you? Because even if you did, you've been subconsciously trained to create a new "there" the second you arrive. Thus, you make your old ceiling your new floor, and, JAY Z style, you're On to the Next One. (Ceiling, in this case.) You unthinkingly sabotage yourself by delaying access to your full expression of positive emotions, because deep down you believe they only exist in the future. 

[Aside: I realize the JAY Z quote was not very cohesive but, more importantly, I realized my letters up to this point were starkly lacking rap lyrics (!) Also, there's a thoughtful JAY Z interview on Letterman's Netflix show My Next Guest Needs No Introduction I wanted to recommend.]

But here's the thing I'm starting to believe more and more: you have it within yourself to experience joy, peace, and fulfillment right now. I do not mean to suggest it's easy, but I do think it's that simple. Rationally: any emotional state you'd in theory have access to in the future, you'd also have access to this very instant. Your emotions aren't tied to "that thing." They are tied to you.

The natural counterargument: but I don't feel positive emotions now! My response, which I say with kindness and gentleness: then you won't feel them in the future, either. Unless you can shift something in the present. Which you can!

[Note: I am absolutely not suggesting you make zero positive changes to your current life situation. (I believe getting in touch with your true desires is of utmost importance.) But I am strongly advocating you don't perpetually delay satisfaction just because that seems to be the default life approach in our society.]

I don't claim to know how to live this out fully, and I acknowledge it's a radical shift: to live not like you are going somewhere, but, rather, to live like you have arrived. 

As a "first step," I've been monitoring the time I spend in the present vs. the time my mind swirls over the past (regret, shame, guilt) or future (stress, worry, anxiety), and trying to increase my time immersed in the present. The short but profound book How to Relax by Zen Master Thich Nhat Hanh contains solid present-centering methods.

In this beautiful poem, Rumi says:

"This is enough was always true. We just haven't seen it."

What if there is no "next thing"? What if you've arrived?

After all, you are here. And you are made of Light and Love.

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s. Another Rumi quote from his poem There's Nothing Ahead:

"The miracle of Jesus is himself, not what he said or did about the future. Forget the future. I'd worship someone who could do that."

p.p.s. Get. that. dirt off your shoulder.

p.p.p.s. JAY Z and Beyoncé have a daughter named Rumi.

Reckoning. | rejoyce letters, vol. 1

Hi Friend,

I'm 29 years old and unemployed. (Thought I'd lead with my most compelling qualities.) My contract ended March 30 and I haven't yet found "anything to do" in the traditional sense. That is to say: I haven't found anything to do in exchange for money which is what most everyone implies when they ask: What are you going to do next?

I should note: most people ask in the most caring way. Still, I'm hard pressed to answer honestly because I don't like making anyone uncomfortable. And nothing makes people uncomfortable like good, old-fashioned uncertainty.

[Aside: To particularly anxious askers I've actually considered saying: "I'm going to NYU law school in the fall." It's a blatant lie but I know the well-worn path would make them feel better. It wouldn't make me feel better. Going to law school sounds about as appealing as getting a Brazilian wax everyday for three years but every time feels like your first time.**

**The first time I got a Brazilian I texted my friend: "Holy shit that hurt!!" and she was all empathetically: "WTF did you expect?" I don't get Brazilians anymore because I take issue with a culture that wants men to be men and women to be girls. Also, they hurt.

Anyway! First-ever newsletter and I indirectly mentioned pubic hair (sorry!) but also: WTF did you expect? ;)]

Back to uncertainty: I think this ever-lurking fear of the unknown is perhaps related to the fear of things we do know but stuff away into the dark crevices of ourselves. The taboo topics, the things we all have and all feel but, yet, somehow, cannot discuss. The things we want to delete! delete! delete! rather than confront. (My discursive mention of Brazilians now seems strangely metaphoric.)

Listening to Isabel Wilkerson speak on reckoning in this On Being podcast episode was an epiphany moment for me. She said:

"Whatever you're ignoring is only going to get worse. Whatever you're ignoring will be there to be reckoned with until you reckon with it."

Take a moment to let that settle. I believe we will eventually have to reckon with everything we fear on both a macro level (see: slavery and the lasting impacts of systemic racism) and the micro level (see: that thing you never even told your therapist).

Well, to clarify, we'll need to reckon in order to fully heal. (Plenty of people go lifetimes without healing, so reckoning, like healing, is optional.)

All that to provide you with my honest answer to: What are you going to do next?

I am healing. In this phase, I consider it healing through reckoning. Specifically, I am reckoning with that thing I never even told my therapist. Also, everything else. I want to examine all the stories and beliefs I've collected over my 29 years to see if they hold up. In many cases, I want to transmute self-limiting beliefs into empowering ones.

At the risk of sounding cheesy or over-ambitious or both: I aim to open every unopened door within my heart.

In Melissa Febos's stunning memoir, Abandon Me, she wrote:

"The unseen parts of us have the most gravity. They repel and compel us."

A quote like that makes me long to illuminate the dark places. As does the Rumi quote of the week:

"You have to keep breaking your heart until it opens."

But the ever-looming question is always: How? Right now, for me, it's about energetically shifting things. I'm doing daily meditation, reading, journaling, forgiveness work, self-love.

And writing. I decided to write this weekly letter first and foremost for myself, to document this transition in an "official" way. If you'd like to read along, I'd be honored.

with Love and with Light,

Joyce

p.s. If Isabel Wilkerson's name sounds familiar, she's the Pulitzer-prize winning author of The Warmth of Other Suns. I haven't read it yet, but it's on my list. 

p.p.s. Trevor Hall has a beautiful song called You Can't Rush Your Healing which I've been listening to when I get anxious about the "timelines" of my healing (i.e. often). Here are my favorite lines, which encapsulate my meditation experience so insanely well I had to share:

"Confusion clouds the heart, but it also points the way.

Quiet down the mind, the more the song will play."

 

rejoyce letters are written weekly by Joyce Elizabeth from Brooklyn, NY. To unsubscribe, simply reply with "unsubscribe." To subscribe click here.

This letter was sent on April 9, 2018.